-Analysis-

PARIS — Could it be that alliances are now taken more seriously in the East — in the Indo-Pacific world — than in the transatlantic Western world?

While Donald Trump is busy firing off his trademark raging tweets against France and its president, the Indian and Japanese prime ministers, Narendra Modi and Shinzo Abe, are showing just how close their bilateral relations have become. At a time when the Western world is divided on every essential matter, the Indians and the Japanese intend to create a "united democratic front" to face China's rising imperial ambitions.

Not so long ago it was the Asians who envied the strength of the Atlantic Alliance. In their eyes, there was a reality in the concept of the West that the Asian world didn't possess. Indeed, wasn't the word "Asian" itself a Western invention? They marveled — especially the Japanese — at the reconciliation process between Europeans, especially between France and Germany. "How did you do it?" they would keep on asking us.

For the U.S., the Chinese threat now clearly prevails over the Russian threat.

They wanted to know our recipes and be inspired by them, and hopefully transpose the reconciliation process and the "geography of values" that formed the foundations of the European Union and the Atlantic Alliance to Asia. During the Cold War, the West existed all the more so because of the clear and immediate Soviet threat.

Today, however, the existence of the Russian threat and the means to deal with it divide Westerners more than bring them closer together. For the British, this is an absolute priority. For the French, it only comes after the terrorist threat. For the Italians, it doesn't exist. For the United States, the Chinese threat now clearly prevails over the Russian threat.

The same differences can be found in Eastern Europe. Poland has given such high priority to the threat from Moscow that it has asked United States to establish a military base on its territory. And this request occurred without prior consultation with the European Union. Hungary, on this issue — and this is no accident — has positions close to those of Italy. There is a pro-Russian component in Orban and Salvini's populist movements.

Confusion and division in the West, simplicity and clarity in the Far East? The description is probably exaggerated, but it reflects a trend, if not a reality. Today, India and Japan emphasize the existence of a common security, prosperity, and destiny between the two countries. The key to post-war Franco-German reconciliation was the existence of a form of balance between the two countries. The sting was the Soviet threat.

Germany's Merkel and France's Macron in Berlin on Nov. 18 — Photo: Michael Kappeler/DPA/ZUMA

The United States, driven at the time by enlightened generosity, gave birth to that rapprochement. In 1953, John Foster Dulles, the then secretary of state under President Eisenhower, threatened Paris with a "heartbreaking revision" of America's commitments to European security if it didn't make progress regarding the European Defence Community (EDC), which ultimately didn't happen. The French at the time preferred a German army within NATO over German soldiers within a European army.

The relationship between Japan and India contains major differences from the Franco-German relationship. There is no common culture, no common religion, no common dramas between the two as in the Franco-German case. Traditionally, Japan — and you can see in Mishima's novels — looked down on "humid Asia." There is, however, a fundamental common ground between these two countries, beyond the perception of the Chinese threat: a sense of balance between them.

Japan, the world's third-largest economy, is a liberal democracy, in the classic sense of the term, and with an aging population. India is a demographic giant on the verge of overtaking China in terms of population numbers. It's also an illiberal democracy that — with its high corruption rate — knows little more about the rule of law than China. And both countries are driven by a strong nationalism, although in the case of India it's of a religious nature.

But what unites them above all is a common fear of China. To counterbalance China, India and Japan can also count on the support of other democracies in the region, such as Australia and Indonesia. Above all — contrary to what seems to be the case in Europe — America is seriously getting involved in Asia.

America's position is perfectly contradictory.

Donald Trump, regardless of what he may say or do, takes the Chinese threat seriously. In Asia, he seems to accept the fact that he may need allies. The expression "America first" applies everywhere, but "America alone" is more perceptible against Western countries than against Asian countries.

Rightly or wrongly, it's as if Washington — by not taking the Russian threat fully seriously — is not taking Europe seriously either. At the same time, one could certainly come to the opposite conclusion and claim that Donald Trump's derogatory remarks about the "European army" are proof that, for the first time, America is taking our will to defend ourselves seriously and no longer considers us to be from "Venus" rather than "Mars," as Robert Kagan put it 15 years ago.

The fact is that, on this issue, America's position is perfectly contradictory. It strongly states that "Europe must pay for its defense," just like we used to say, before World War II, that "Germany will pay." But on the other hand, Washington really doesn't want Europe to become a security pillar either next to or even inside NATO. It doesn't view Europe as an equal, real or potential, unlike how the new Asian allies, Japan and India, see each other.

Respect and balance are the keys to success for any alliance … And, let's not forget, the perception of a common threat.


See more from Opinion / Analysis here